Switching Billing Platforms: What You Should Know

Switching your OHIP billing platform feels daunting. You've got years of claims history, established workflows, and the nagging worry that something will break during the transition. But staying on an expensive or outdated platform has real costs too — costs that compound over an entire career.

Here's what to consider when evaluating a switch.

The Real Cost of Your Current Platform

Most physicians don't think about billing fees in annual terms. But they should.

At $400,000 in annual OHIP billings (roughly the Ontario average), here's what different platforms cost:

| Platform | Rate | Annual Cost | |----------|------|-------------| | SnapBill Basic | 0.2% | $800 | | Self-serve platforms | 0.25% | $1,000 | | Full-serve platforms | 1.95% | $7,800 | | Traditional billing agent | 2.5% | $10,000 |

The difference between 0.2% and 1.95% is $7,000 per year. Over a 30-year career, invested at a modest 7% return, that's over $170,000 in compounded savings.

What to Look for in a New Platform

Not all billing platforms are created equal. Here's what matters:

Accuracy

The cheapest platform is worthless if it doesn't catch errors. Look for automated validation that catches common errors — health cards, fee code compatibility, and submission deadlines — before claims go out.

Speed

How long does it take to bill a full day? One-by-one entry is slow. Bulk processing and photo-based claim generation can cut billing time by 90%.

Reconciliation

Does the platform automatically match your Remittance Advice payments to submitted claims? Without this, you're doing manual reconciliation — or worse, not reconciling at all.

Independence

Who owns the platform? A physician-owned tool is built for physicians. A bank subsidiary has different priorities.

Migration Is Easier Than You Think

The most common reason physicians stay on an overpriced platform is inertia. But migration doesn't have to be painful:

1. Your claims history stays with OHIP: All submitted claims are in the MCEDT system regardless of which platform you used to submit them
2. Patient data is portable: Most platforms can export patient lists
3. No downtime required: You can run both platforms in parallel during transition
4. Pending claims aren't affected: Claims already submitted continue processing normally

The Ownership Question

It's worth asking: who benefits when your billing platform charges more?

Some platforms are subsidiaries of major banks. Their pricing reflects shareholder expectations, not physician needs. An independent, physician-owned platform has one stakeholder: you.

---

Curious what you'd save by switching? Try SnapBill's savings calculator or sign up free to see the difference.